<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Palmyra Chambers - Barristers Serving Warrington, Manchester, Liverpool, Chester, Cheshire and Surrounding Areas &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palmyrachambers.com/category/news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palmyrachambers.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Costs: Motto &amp; Others -v- Trafigura: Court of Appeal judgment handed down.</title>
		<link>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/costs-motto-others-v-trafigura-court-of-appeal-judgment-handed-down</link>
		<comments>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/costs-motto-others-v-trafigura-court-of-appeal-judgment-handed-down#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmyrachambers.com/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeal have handed down their much awaited judgment this morning. Their Lordships&#8217; conclusions were as follows:-
i) Proportionality: I would allow the defendants’ ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/costs-motto-others-v-trafigura-court-of-appeal-judgment-handed-down/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Law: Delay and Constructive Dismissal &#8211; Fereday v South Staffordshire NHS Primary Care Trust</title>
		<link>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/employment-law-delay-and-constructive-dismissal-fereday-v-south-staffordshire-nhs-primary-care-trust</link>
		<comments>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/employment-law-delay-and-constructive-dismissal-fereday-v-south-staffordshire-nhs-primary-care-trust#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cathy Mitchell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmyrachambers.com/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delaying for six weeks and accepting sick pay before finally resigning meant that an employee lost her chance to claim constructive dismissal.The EAT held that the delay was of such a length that she had affirmed her contract]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/employment-law-delay-and-constructive-dismissal-fereday-v-south-staffordshire-nhs-primary-care-trust/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Costs: No award of interest before Detailed Assessment in CFA funded case: Bridle -v- Ikhlas &amp; Motto –v- Trafigura</title>
		<link>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/no-award-of-interest-before-detailed-assessment-in-cfa-funded-case-bridle-v-iklas</link>
		<comments>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/no-award-of-interest-before-detailed-assessment-in-cfa-funded-case-bridle-v-iklas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 12:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmyrachambers.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Master Hurst has added to the judicial pressure mounting upon the CFA regime by adding his voice to those of HHJ Stewart &#038; HHJ Harris]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/no-award-of-interest-before-detailed-assessment-in-cfa-funded-case-bridle-v-iklas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit Hire: Will the decision in Chen Wei -v- Cambridge Power and Light Ltd be short-lived?</title>
		<link>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/credit-hire-will-the-decision-in-chen-wei-v-cambridge-power-and-light-ltd-be-short-lived</link>
		<comments>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/credit-hire-will-the-decision-in-chen-wei-v-cambridge-power-and-light-ltd-be-short-lived#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Mulla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmyrachambers.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enforceability of Credit Hire Agreements is again under the spotlight following judgment in Chen Wei –v- Cambridge Power and Light Ltd (10th September 2010, Cambridge County Court). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://palmyrachambers.com/news/credit-hire-will-the-decision-in-chen-wei-v-cambridge-power-and-light-ltd-be-short-lived/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

